Of time itself, it appears absent of all projections.
I’d consider the aspirin of time to have a greater impact than any philosophy.
Dunbar as many, retired on the profits and stopped thinking.
We have yet to try the commons of time itself, thoughts are fleeting as is the love for them in the endless scroll of people, scattered across the flat factory floor of time, 24/7. The two unmatched theories, uncomfortable with the moon.
Your description of how tarot can be a useful tool for inner work is spot on, thanks for articulating that so helpfully. I’d be interested to hear you flesh that out more and also the pitfalls waiting for the newbie if you’re so inclined, or a pointer to a good resource in lieu of that if you have one. Glad I found your substack, your writing is opening up some threads I haven’t found before. Thanks.
This is an excellent breakdown. So much writing about this subject veers into the frustratingly opaque, so much so that one wonders whether the opaqueness is deliberate, there to obscure a genuine lack of meaning.
But your explanation is clear, and synthesises everything wonderfully.
great breakdown. going to go set-up my first ritual!
Of time itself, it appears absent of all projections.
I’d consider the aspirin of time to have a greater impact than any philosophy.
Dunbar as many, retired on the profits and stopped thinking.
We have yet to try the commons of time itself, thoughts are fleeting as is the love for them in the endless scroll of people, scattered across the flat factory floor of time, 24/7. The two unmatched theories, uncomfortable with the moon.
Your description of how tarot can be a useful tool for inner work is spot on, thanks for articulating that so helpfully. I’d be interested to hear you flesh that out more and also the pitfalls waiting for the newbie if you’re so inclined, or a pointer to a good resource in lieu of that if you have one. Glad I found your substack, your writing is opening up some threads I haven’t found before. Thanks.
This is an excellent breakdown. So much writing about this subject veers into the frustratingly opaque, so much so that one wonders whether the opaqueness is deliberate, there to obscure a genuine lack of meaning.
But your explanation is clear, and synthesises everything wonderfully.